Case study 04

Six-figure commercial work, sold from a residential website.

A commercial re-roofing contractor bidding TPO and modified bitumen work, whose website spoke entirely to homeowners.

Outcome

Ten months after launch.

Three figures from the engagement, each traced to the client's own reporting rather than ours.

01 CLIENT CRM EXPORT
4 to 17

Qualified commercial enquiries

Inbound commercial enquiries per quarter, counted as enquiries that reached a site visit. The residential enquiry volume was unaffected.

02 CLIENT REPORTING
$180K

Average enquiry value

Average contract value of commercial enquiries generated through the new specification content, against a residential average near $19K.

03 CLIENT CITATION LOG
22 of 30

Specification citations

Material and specification queries where the site is now the cited source, including TPO against EPDM and re-cover against tear-off.

FIGURES APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE CLIENT. COMPANY NAME WITHHELD UNDER A CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT.

The situation

The company did both residential and commercial work, but the site was entirely residential. Facility managers and property owners researching a re-roof found nothing addressed to them, so the commercial pipeline came only from relationships and the occasional bid list.

What the audit found

The commercial buyer researches differently. They search materials, systems, warranties, and lifecycle cost long before they search for a contractor. Thirty such queries had meaningful volume in the region and the answers being published came from manufacturers, not contractors, which meant no local company was in the conversation.

What we did about it

A commercial section with its own architecture. System pages for TPO, EPDM, modified bitumen, and metal, each with lifecycle cost and warranty terms. Comparison pages for the decisions a facility manager actually makes. A specification library, and project pages by building type rather than by suburb.

Where it landed

Commercial enquiries roughly quadrupled per quarter, and the ones arriving through the specification pages came in further along. They already knew what system they wanted and were asking about scheduling and warranty rather than starting from scratch.

Before and after

A residential site, then two audiences served properly.

The residential side was left intact. The commercial side was built beside it.

Before At audit

One audience, one voice

COMMERCIAL PAGES1
SYSTEM PAGESNONE
COMMERCIAL ENQUIRIES4 / QUARTER
SPEC CONTENTNONE
AI CITATIONS3 OF 30
After Ten months after launch

Two architectures, one domain

COMMERCIAL PAGES26
SYSTEM PAGESFOUR
COMMERCIAL ENQUIRIES17 / QUARTER
SPEC CONTENTLIBRARY
AI CITATIONS22 OF 30

FIGURES SUPPLIED BY THE CLIENT AND APPROVED IN WRITING. COMPANY NAME WITHHELD UNDER A CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT.

What shipped

A second architecture, built alongside the first.

01 / DISCOVER

Paid Discovery

A 30-query commercial set, analysis of who answers those questions now, and a separate architecture for that buyer.

02 / BUILD

Commercial section, 26 pages

System pages, comparison pages, a specification library, and project pages organised by building type.

03 / LAUNCH

Launch without disturbing residential

Published as a parallel section with its own internal-link model, so residential rankings were left untouched.

Questions

Questions about this engagement.

Why not build a separate domain?+

Because the authority already existed on this one. Two domains would have meant starting the commercial side from zero and maintaining two builds.

Did the residential side suffer?+

No. Residential enquiry volume held through the period, and the internal-link model keeps the two sections distinct.

How long before commercial enquiries moved?+

About five months. Commercial research cycles are longer, so the lag is longer than residential.

Want this run on your market?

$2,500, and you find out what is winnable.